Department of Justice prosecuting attorney believedisgraced FTX founder Sam Bankman - Friedleaked the journal of his sometimes girlfriend and business partner Caroline Ellison in an attempt to “ discredit a attestator . ” The mental object of the 27 - year - old Alameda research chief executive officer ’s private Google Docs were recently put out in aNew York Times articlewhich let in entries of Ellison discussing her combative human relationship with SBF and admitting she felt unqualified to lead the party .
hour after the Times story was published , U.S. Attorney Damian Williams made the bluff title in acourt filingThursday evening . He accused Bankman - Fried — or SBF as he ’s cognise — of sharing the diary with a Times newsperson in an effort to discredit Ellison and corrupt a jury consortium in his pseud trial . Williams claims SBF ’s lawyer told the DOJ SBF had meet with one of the Times reporters in person and shared documents with him that were n’t part of the government ’s normal discovery fabric . The DOJ believes the entries quote in the Times story , in fact , in all probability develop from SBF ’s own Google Drive account .
SBF ’s legal squad did not immediately respond to Gizmodo ’s request for comment .
Photo: David Dee Delgado (Getty Images)
All of that ’s a trouble , accord to the DOJ , because civic routine rules bar lawyers or their agents ( in this case , SBF ) from let go non - public information about criminal case if there ’s “ a strong likelihood that such dissemination will step in with a average trial . ” Other ruler bar the sacking of statements or documents that could harm the credibleness or testimonial of potential viewer . It ’s expected Ellison , who’salready pleaded shamed to vicious charges , will likely attest at SBF ’s criminal fraud trial later this class and say she agreed to defraud customers with SBF .
“ By selectively sharing sealed secret documents with the New York Times , the defendant is assay to discredit a witness , cast Ellison in a poor light , and advance his defense through the insistence and outside the constraints of the court and rules of evidence : that Ellison was a jilted lover who perpetrated these crimes alone , ” Williams wrote .
Williams requested an order from the judge preventing SBF from share any further extrajudicial statements .
What did Ellion say in her journal?
Ellison ’s diary , which came by manner of various Google Docs entries , show her at points appear to feel overwhelmed by her role at Alameda and speculate on her separation with SBF . The Alameda Research head reportedly admitted she was “ feeling fairly distressed and overwhelmed ” with her job just three months prior toFTX ’s major implosion .
“ At the end of the daytime I ca n’t wait to go home and reverse off my phone and have a drink and get away from it all , ” she wrote .
Elsewhere , Ellison expressed detail of her fraying family relationship with SBF , whom she had reportedly dated on and off . Ellison reportedly said she was upset about “ hold matter uncanny ” or “ causing drama ” with the FTX father . In another entry directly addressed to SBF , Ellison reportedly said a previous breakup with him had “ significantly decreased [ her ] agitation about Alameda . ”
Ellison also expressed self - doubt over her ability to run Alameda , a point that SBF ’s attorney could potentially use to taste and muddy her testimonial . One document reportedly listing out expanse where Ellsion believed she scramble included the lyric “ decisiveness ” and “ leadership . ”
“ run Alameda does n’t feel like something I ’m that relatively advantaged at or well suited to do , ” Ellison wrote .
Alameda ResearchCaroline EllisonCorporate crimeGizmodoJoseph BankmanLaw , CrimeSam Bankman - Fried
Daily Newsletter
Get the best technical school , scientific discipline , and civilisation news in your inbox daily .
intelligence from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like
